| The
Financial Forum is our quarterly newsletter consisting
of accounting, tax and management advice and tips.
We welcome your comments regarding items of interest
you would like to see in the future. |
START
PLANNING NOW FOR AMT
If
you thought the alternative minimum tax (AMT) was only
for the most affluent taxpayers, think again. Although
AMT was originally created to prevent the wealthy from
avoiding tax, a rapidly increasing number of middle-income
taxpayers are falling into its grasp.
In 1970,
only 19,000 people owed AMT. By 1996 this figure had
jumped to about 600,000. And the 2001 tax law will exacerbate
the problem. The Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation
projects that 1.4 million taxpayers will pay AMT for
2001, skyrocketing to more than 35 million by 2010.
Why is this
happening? Inflation is the primary culprit. Unlike
regular tax brackets, exemptions, and deductions, AMT
tax brackets and exemptions have never been adjusted
for inflation. As middle-class income grow, therefore,
more and more taxpayers are exposed to AMT.
The new tax
law, by reducing regular income tax rates, also increases
the number of taxpayers subject to AMT (taxpayers must
pay regular tax or AMT, whichever is higher).
Computing
AMT
AMT is a
separate tax system, with its own set of tax rates,
deductions, and exclusions. And the rules are generally
less favorable than those that apply for regular tax.
To calculate AMT:
- Determine
your alternative minimum taxable income (AMTI; see
below).
- Subtract
an exemption amount - $49,000 for joint filers, $35,750
for single filers. (The exemption is phased out for
joint filers beginning at $150,000 of AMTI and is
eliminated when AMTI exceeds $346,000. For single
filers, the phase-out range is $112,500 to $255,000.)
- Multiply
this amount by the AMT tax rate - 26 percent of the
first $175,000, 28 percent on the rest. If your AMT
is greater than your regular tax, you're liable for
the larger amount.
Note: The
2001 tax law temporarily increased AMT exemptions as
well as the income levels at which the exemptions are
phased out. In 2005, absent further legislation, the
exemptions will return to their previous levels of $45,000
for joint filers and $33,750 for single filers, and
the top end of the phase-out range will drop back to
$330,000 for joint filers and $247,500 for single filers.
Who's
At Risk?
To determine
your AMTI, you start with your regular taxable income
and add certain deductions and exclusions ("tax
preference items"). Taxpayers with large amounts
of any of these items should plan for the possibility
of AMT liability. Preference items include:
- Personal
exemptions
- Deductions
for state and local income taxes, real estate taxes,
and personal property taxes
- Certain
deductible medical expenses
- Certain
miscellaneous itemized deductions
- Mortgage
interest (unless the loan is used to buy, build, or
substantially improve a residence)
- Investment
interest expense
- Tax-exempt
interest on certain private activity bonds
- The spread
between the market price and exercise price of incentive
stock options if not sold in the year of exercise
Planning
If you're
at risk for AMT, there may be opportunities to minimize
or eliminate its impact. Certain AMT adjustments, for
example, generate minimum tax credits that can be used
to reduce regular income tax in a later year.
Strategies
for reducing or avoiding AMT include:
- Deferring
deductions that aren't deductible for AMT purposes,
such as state and local income taxes, to a later year
- Reducing
AMTI to avoid phaseout of the AMT exemption
- Increasing
regular taxable income to avoid AMT
- Postponing
the exercise of incentive stock options that would
trigger AMT liability
- Borrowing
only the amount needed to buy, build, or substantially
improve a residence
It's best
to take a long-term approach to AMT planning. Don't
take drastic measures to avoid the tax this year if
it would result in a large tax bite next year. If you're
teetering on the edge of AMT liability, project your
income, deductions, and exclusions several years into
the future and work with a tax advisor to develop an
AMT strategy.
VIATICAL
SETTLEMENTS:
MAKING THE MOST OF UNNEEDED LIFE INSURANCE
The
viatical settlement is a technique by which an insured
sells a life insurance policy to an insurance company
or other investor in exchange for a percentage of the
policy's face value.
Viatical
settlements offer terminally or chronically ill persons
an opportunity to trade life insurance for immediate
cash on an income-tax free basis. Those in good health
can also take advantage of viatical settlements (albeit
on a taxable basis) if they no longer need or want their
life insurance because of changes in estate or business
planning needs, or economic conditions. The taxable
amount is determined by subtracting the policy's basis
(premiums paid) from the settlement proceeds.
Who
Should Consider A Viatical Settlement?
A viatical
settlement is an attractive option when one's circumstances
make an existing life insurance policy unnecessary or
undesirable. For example:
Businesses
- A policy purchased to finance a buy/sell agreement
is no longer needed because the business has been
sold to a third party.
- A key-man policy is unnecessary after the business
is sold.
- Tax law changes reduced the benefits of some leveraged
COLI (corporate-owned life insurance) programs by
providing that interest on loans to fund such programs
is no longer tax-deductible.
- A business owns a key-man policy on an executive
who has retired or is no longer employed by the business.
- A company is in bankruptcy and must sell assets
to pay creditors.
- Policies purchased to fund deferred compensation
or retirement benefit programs are no longer needed,
because of changes in the programs.
Individuals
- A change
in the size of the insured's estate or in the tax
laws has reduced the amount of insurance needed to
pay projected estate taxes.
- Changes
in the insured's financial circumstances have made
the premiums unaffordable.
- Vanishing
premiums have reappeared.
- There
are large loans against a policy, making it expensive
to maintain.
- The insured
wishes to remove a policy from his or her estate.
- The policy
is no longer appropriate because survivorship coverage
is preferable.
- The insured
outlives his or her beneficiaries.
The amount
of the settlement varies depending on the remaining
premiums required and the health of the insured. There
are circumstances in which term insurance policies,
which have no cash surrender value, nevertheless have
a significant value in a viatical settlement.
Viatical
settlements aren't appropriate for everyone, but under
the right circumstances they can present an attractive
option.
INVESTING
IN UNCERTAIN TIMES
For
many investors this year, the stock market has been
unnerving, even before September 11. But it's important
to remember that, despite periodic setbacks, the stock
market has historically moved steadily upward. Since
1926, for example, the S&P 500 posted negative returns
in 21 separate years, or 28 percent of the 75-year period.
Yet during this same period, the index generated an
average annual return of approximately 15 percent. Although
the past is no guarantee of future results, history
shows us that over the long term, achieving healthy
returns requires patience through many down markets.
If you've
constructed a well-diversified portfolio that takes
into account your long-term goals and risk tolerance
you need not lose sleep over market volatility.
Diversification
Even a seemingly
rock-solid investment has the potential to go both up
and down, sometimes by large amounts. Even though the
long-term direction of the market has historically been
positive, it's difficult to predict whether a particular
stock will go up.
In volatile
markets, you can improve your chances of success by
diversifying your portfolio. The more stocks you own
(to a point), the less likely that poor performance
in any one will be disastrous for your overall returns.
That's why many people are attracted to mutual funds,
which often own 100 or more individual securities. By
investing in a single fund, you're able to achieve a
level of diversification that would be difficult to
achieve on your own.
Once you've
ensured your portfolio has a sufficient number of investments,
you should then look to balance the types of securities
you own. Your goal should be to own a variety of investments
that all respond to market conditions differently. For
example, if you already own a number of large-cap stocks,
perhaps your next investments should be in small - or
mid-cap stocks. Or if your portfolio is tilted heavily
toward growth, you can help smooth its performance by
adding stocks that display value characteristics. If
all your investments are in U.S. businesses, consider
adding a few overseas companies.
Asset
Allocation
Asset allocation
is another way of saying you should make sure your portfolio
is divided properly between different asset classes,
or investment types. The most common asset classes are
stocks, bonds, and cash. Stocks offer the highest returns
but at the greatest risk to your investment. Bonds provide
regular income as well as opportunity for capital gains
or losses. Investing in cash, or money-market investments,
offers modest rewards but carries minimal risks.
Each asset
class may outperform the others at varying times, and
this can work to your favor during market turbulence.
Therefore, owning a mix of investment types helps protect
you during periods of market volatility. For example,
owning bonds along with stocks may limit your potential
returns during rising stock markets, but they may also
provide welcome stability during falling ones.
Understanding
your tolerance for risk is especially important. Risk
tolerance is partly personality-based - some people
are naturally more comfortable with the idea that they
could lose part or all of their investments. Yet your
risk tolerance can also change over time. When you're
21, for example, you might be willing to invest entirely
in stocks because you have more time to ride out market
volatility. A few years later, however, you might be
preparing to make a down payment on a house and decide
to allocate more of your assets into investments offering
greater stability. The right asset allocation for you
at any given time is the one that provides you with
the best opportunity to meet your financial goals, regardless
of market conditions.
For your
investment strategy to remain effective, you must continuously
monitor your portfolio and make adjustments as needed.
If your investment goals change, for example, you may
need to rethink your asset allocation. Perhaps your
goal was to save for retirement, but now you have a
shorter-term goal of saving for a child's college education.
Depending on the number of years until the child is
ready for college, it may be appropriate to shift some
of your funds into less volatile investments.
Another reason
for regular monitoring is that the balance of assets
in your portfolio will naturally shift as certain investments
outperform others. In a period of rapid growth in the
stock market, for example, you may find that your portfolio
quickly becomes more heavily weighted toward stocks
than you originally desired. So you may want to rebalance
your portfolio to be consistent with your original target
allocations.
|